The evidence register · The Molecules Behind the Naturals

The Molecules Behind the Naturals: the evidence

The claims The Molecules Behind the Naturals makes, as it makes them today: 19 sourced, 6 labeled for what they are, 5 unsourced.

About 3 minutes of reading

The whole register · the page itself

The molecules behind nature’s masterworks

Raw Material Adulteration

  • house interpretation What’s sold as “sandalwood oil” is often: Australian S. spicatum (different species, different smell), synthetic santalol blends, or Indian sandalwood heavily diluted with synthetics. Buyer beware.
  • unsourced Pure Lavandula angustifolia from Provence costs far more than lavandin (a hybrid).
  • house interpretation GC-MS analysis is how it is caught; a “100% pure” label on its own proves little.
  • unsourced A perfumer designing with “jasmine absolute” that’s actually partly synthetic indole and benzyl acetate creates a different fragrance than one using genuine Grasse jasmine.
  • unsourced Difficult at low levels of adulteration
  • house interpretation Large buyers commonly test the materials they receive — but smaller perfumers often cannot afford it.

from the house’s claims register and the records, checked against the pages’ own words when the site was built

Help bring a GC-MS lab and free classes to the guide. why?